MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968492524 · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.251

University and Change in Iranian Young Women's Identity: A Case Study on Female Students of Tehran and Rasht Universities

2013· article· en· W1968492524 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hamid Ebadollahi Chanzanagh, Haneyeh Madadi

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Cultural Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)ReligiosityGirlReflexivityModernization theoryQuarter (Canadian coin)Gender studiesJournalismSociologyPsychologySocial sciencePolitical scienceSocial psychologyMedia studiesHistoryDevelopmental psychologyLawArtAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the last quarter of a century, post-revolutionary Iranian society has undergone fundamental social and cultural changes. Modernization of Iranian women through their access to modern education has radically changed their views. The changes were accompanied by reflecting on Iranian women's traditional identity. As a result of the reflection, presence of Iranian women in new fields, like journalism, movies, writing, and areas exclusive to male like engineering and related professions has increased. The present study attempts to evaluate the changes in Iranian girl's identity after ent ering university. 384 female students from Tehran and Guilan universities were chosen to study their reflexive identity. Changes in women's attitudes toward gender stereotypes after entering university and strong influence of university on reflexivity of their womanish identity are basic theses of this survey. Results show that after entering university the rate of reflexivity in traditional identity increases, this increase is accompanied by decrease in religiosity among female students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia - Social and Behavioral SciencesSame topicSocial and Cultural DynamicsFrench-language works237,207