MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968505023 · doi:10.1055/s-2007-986698

Neonatal Macrocephaly: Cerebral Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor or Neuroblastoma as an Infrequent Cause-A Case Report and Review of the Literature

2007· review· en· W1968505023 on OpenAlexaff
Gregor W. Kaczala, Kenneth J. Poskitt, Paul Steinbok, Glenda Hendson, Patrice Eydoux, Alfonso Solimano

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Perinatology · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMacrocephalyMedicineEpendymomaMagnetic resonance imagingPathologyMalignancyAstrocytomaHistopathologyHydrocephalusRadiologyAnatomyGlioma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a male term newborn presenting with a congenital macrocephaly 3.5 standard deviations above the median, with a wide and tense anterior fontanel, splayed calvarial sutures, and muscular hypotonia. Antenatal head circumferences were repeatedly below the median. A postnatal head ultrasound showed a large right intracerebral mass with right lateral ventricle compression, right temporal horn dilation, and right frontal horn enlargement with lateral displacement. Additional imaging by computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging was performed. A decompression was performed and histology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular biology supported the diagnosis of a primitive neuroectodermal tumor. A MYCN gene amplification assay remained negative. The incidence of neonatal brain tumors is between 1.4 and 4.1/100,000 live births. Their most common presentation is macrocephaly, hydrocephalus, stillbirth, or diagnosis by pre- or postnatal imaging. Although hydrocephaly and intra- or extracranial hemorrhage are the most frequent causes of congenital macrocephaly, this should be initially investigated by head ultrasound. A suspected malignancy will be confirmed by histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of PerinatologySame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207