MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968528666 · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.3670

Determining Air Entry Value in Peat Substrates

2002· article· en· W1968528666 on OpenAlexaff
M. R. Nemati, Jean Caron, Olivier Banton, Pier‐Alexandre Tardif

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Science Society of America Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersDivision of Chemistry
KeywordsPeatAerationEnvironmental scienceTension (geology)Hydraulic conductivitySubstrate (aquarium)Range (aeronautics)Thermal diffusivityHydrology (agriculture)Soil scienceMaterials scienceChemistryGeotechnical engineeringGeologyComposite materialThermodynamicsSoil waterPhysicsEcologyUltimate tensile strength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Insufficient aeration in artificial mixes used for nursery and greenhouse production is commonly reported to be a problem. To diagnose aeration problems, gas relative diffusivity estimates can be used. These estimates can be obtained indirectly from measurements of air entry value, saturated hydraulic conductivity and the water desorption curve. In here, a rapid tension chamber method for measuring air entry is proposed. To verify applicability of the method, different potted substrates were inserted into a tension chamber apparatus and water was extracted from the saturated substrate by establishing a contact with an unsaturated body located outside the chamber. The potential within the chamber was monitored over a 5‐min period and the point of air entry was calculated thereafter. Statistically equal estimates of air entry were obtained with this technique compared with values derived from the tension table, for a wide range of air entry values in peat‐based substrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoil Science Society of America JournalSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207