INFLUENCE OF DIET ON REPELLENT AND FEEDING-DETERRENT ACTIVITY OF LARVAL ORAL EXUDATE IN SPRUCE BUDWORMS (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A two-choice feeding bioassay was used to investigate the effects of larval source (colony versus wild larvae) and rearing medium (artificial versus foliar diet) on the feeding-deterrent activity of the oral exudate of the spruce budworm and the western spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) and Choristoneura occidentalis Free., respectively. Feeding by both wild and colony larvae was deterred by conspecific oral exudate. Larvae reared on artificial diet responded to exudate from both diet- and foliage-reared larvae, whereas the foliage-reared larvae responded only to exudate from other foliage-reared larvae. These results suggest that differences exist between artificial diet- and foliage-reared larvae in the composition of oral exudate, in the concentrations of its biologically active constituents, or in differential sensitivity of diet- and foliage-reared larvae to exudate from foliage-reared larvae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".