Coarse-grain simulations of active molecular machines in lipid bilayers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A coarse-grain method for simulations of the dynamics of active protein inclusions in lipid bilayers is described. It combines the previously proposed hybrid simulations of bilayers [M.-J. Huang, R. Kapral, A. S. Mikhailov, and H.-Y. Chen, J. Chem. Phys. 137, 055101 (2012)], based on molecular dynamics for the lipids and multi-particle collision dynamics for the solvent, with an elastic-network description of active proteins. The method is implemented for a model molecular machine which performs active conformational motions induced by ligand binding and its release after reaction. The situation characteristic for peripheral membrane proteins is considered. Statistical investigations of the effects of single active or passive inclusions on the shape of the membrane are carried out. The results show that the peripheral machine produces asymmetric perturbations of the thickness of two leaflets of the membrane. It also produces a local saddle in the midplane height of the bilayer. Analysis of the power spectrum of the fluctuations of the membrane midplane shows that the conformational motion of the machine perturbs these membrane fluctuations. The hydrodynamic lipid flows induced by cyclic conformational changes in the machine are analyzed. It is shown that such flows are long-ranged and should provide an additional important mechanism for interactions between active inclusions in biological membranes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".