MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968588337 · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.556

Meta-Analysis of Trials on Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease and Objective Evidence of Myocardial Ischemia

2015· review· en· W1968588337 on OpenAlexaff
Hemal Gada, Ajay J. Kirtane, Dean J. Kereiakes, Sripal Bangalore, Jeffrey W. Moses, Philippe Généreux, Roxana Mehran, George Dangas, Martin B. Leon, Gregg W. Stone

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Cardiology · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
FundersCordisNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteAbbott VascularBoston Scientific CorporationEdwards Lifesciences
KeywordsMedicineConventional PCIFractional flow reserveCardiologyPercutaneous coronary interventionInternal medicineIschemiaRevascularizationMyocardial infarctionHazard ratioRandomized controlled trialPopulationCoronary artery diseaseConfidence intervalCoronary angiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0210.041
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of CardiologySame topicCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207