MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Severe normal tissue complication correlates with increased in vitro fibroblast radiosensitivity in radical prostate radiotherapy: A case report

2000· article· en· W1968641103 on OpenAlexaff
G. P. Raaphorst, Shawn Malone, J. Szántó, R Gray

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Cancer · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEffects of Radiation Exposure
Canadian institutionsOttawa Regional Cancer Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiosensitivityRadiation therapyProstate cancerFibroblastMedicineCancer researchProstateIn vitroPathologyOncologyCancerRadiobiologyInternal medicineBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The radiation responses of fibroblasts taken from four patients undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer were evaluated in vitro. One patient exhibited a severe normal tissue late reaction after radiotherapy, and the fibroblasts from this patient also showed increased radiosensitivity. The other three patients exhibited a normal clinical response, and their fibroblast response in vitro was also considered normal when compared with previously published data from our laboratory. When cells were allowed to repair potentially lethal damage (PLDR), the differences between cell lines were reduced; therefore, a deficiency in PLDR did not cause the differences in radiosensitivity. Fractionated radiation resulted in elevated survival due to repair of sublethal damage (SLDR), and the differences in radiosensitivity were increased. In addition, the survival curves displayed an upward bending nature, indicative of an adaptive response. Thus, adaptive response and ability to modify it may play an important role in fractionated radiotherapy. Int. J. Cancer (Radiat. Oncol. Invest.) 90, 336-342 (2000).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of CancerSame topicEffects of Radiation ExposureFrench-language works237,207