MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968647669 · doi:10.1080/01457630802304287

Empirical Correlations for Free Convection in an Isothermal Asymmetrically Heated Vertical Channel

2008· article· en· W1968647669 on OpenAlexaff
Derek Roeleveld, David Naylor, Patrick H. Oosthuizen

Bibliographic record

VenueHeat Transfer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNusselt numberPrandtl numberMechanicsThermodynamicsRayleigh numberLaminar flowIsothermal processNatural convectionConvectionMaterials scienceHeat transferConvective heat transferReynolds numberPhysicsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laminar free convection in an isothermal asymmetrically heated vertical channel has been extensively studied in the past, and empirical correlations for the overall channel convective heat transfer rate are available in the literature. However, this problem has been revisited in order to develop empirical correlations that allow the calculation of the average Nusselt number for each channel wall separately. A numerical solution has been obtained for a Prandtl number of 0.71 and for Rayleigh numbers ranging from the conduction regime to the isolated boundary layer regime. The data have been used to develop correlations for the average Nusselt numbers on the hot and cold walls. These correlations satisfy a heat balance for the overall channel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeat Transfer EngineeringSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207