MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968647891 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2015.2413153

A 3.2 V –15 dBm Adaptive Threshold-Voltage Compensated RF Energy Harvester in 130 nm CMOS

2015· article· en· W1968647891 on OpenAlexaff
Zohaib Hameed, Kambiz Moez

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRectifier (neural networks)Electrical engineeringCMOSTransistorThreshold voltageVoltagePower semiconductor deviceMaterials scienceElectronic engineeringEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an adaptive RF-DC power converter designed to efficiently convert RF signals to DC voltages utilizing auxiliary transistors to control the threshold voltage of the transistors in the main rectifier chain dynamically. The proposed circuit passively reduces the threshold voltage of the forward-biased transistors to increase the harvested power and the output voltage and increases the threshold voltage of the reverse-biased transistors to reduce the leakage current to prevent the loss of previously stored energy. A 12-stage adaptive threshold-compensated rectifier is designed and implemented in IBM's 0.13 μm CMOS technology. The proposed rectifier exhibits measured maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 32% at -15 dBm (32 μW) of input power while delivering 3.2 V to a 1 M Ω load. At a remarkably low input power of -20.5 dBm (8.9 μW) for a 1 M Ω load, the rectifier produces an output voltage of 1 V.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207