MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968663763 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22036

Modelling and simulation of carbon dioxide absorption by aqueous MEA solution in hollow fibre membrane contactors

2014· article· en· W1968663763 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Saber Memardoost, Aref Hashemi, Asghar Molaei Dehkordi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSharif University of Technology
KeywordsContactorMass transferAqueous solutionMaterials scienceReboilerChemistryCarbon dioxideMechanicsHeat transferMethaneThermodynamicsChemical engineeringChromatographyDistillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this article, a comprehensive model has been developed for analyzing the transport phenomena in hollow fibre membrane contactors operated under non‐wetted or partially wetted conditions. In this regard, the dynamic behaviour of membrane contactors, considering the entrance regions of momentum, thermal energy, and mass transfers, was investigated carefully. Moreover, effects of temperature distribution on the contactor efficiency were examined by taking into account the influences of heat of solution, heat of reaction, and the viscous dissipation. The chemical system studied was a gas sweetening process, including methane and carbon dioxide as the gaseous mixture, and MEA aqueous solution as the solvent. CFD techniques have been used to solve the nonlinear governing equations simultaneously, and the model predictions were validated against reported experimental data in the literature, and excellent agreement was found. Comparing the model predictions with those of previous models shows relatively better accuracy of the model predictions. Furthermore, distributions of velocity, temperature, and species concentrations in the tube side, shell side, and the membrane were obtained and the effects of various operating and design parameters such as wetting fraction, gas and liquid inlet velocities, inlet temperature of the solvent, MEA concentration, and CO2 volume fraction of the feed on these distributions were carefully studied. Finally, the dynamic response of the system was investigated by analyzing the contactor's response to different step and pulse changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207