MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968674595 · doi:10.1002/jcb.20424

Osteogenic PTHs and vascular ossification—Is there a danger for osteoporotics?

2005· review· en· W1968674595 on OpenAlexaff
J. F. Whitfield

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Biochemistry · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVascular smooth muscleOssificationCalcificationEndocrinologyInternal medicineReceptorMedicineOsteoblastCell biologyChemistryCancer researchBiologyAnatomyBiochemistryIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inflammation in vascular (mostly arterial) walls and heart valves triggered by the trans-endothelial influx of LDL particles and the action of subsequently modified (e.g., by oxidation) LDL particles can trigger true bone formation by valvar fibroblasts, by a subpopulation of re-differentiation-competent VSMCs (vascular smooth muscle cells) or by vascular pericytes. Vascular ossification can lead to heart failure and death. Elderly osteoporotic women who need osteogenic drugs to restore their lost skeletal bone are paradoxically prone to vascular ossification-the "calcification paradox." The recent introduction into the clinic of a potently osteogenic parathyroid hormone peptide, Lilly's rhPTH-(1-34)OH (Forteotrade mark), to reverse skeletal bone loss raises the question of whether this and other potently osteogenic PTHs still in clinical trial might also stimulate vascular ossification in such osteoporotic women. Indeed the VSMCs in human and rat atherosclerotic lesions hyperexpress PTHrP and the PTHR1 (or PTH1R) receptor as do maturing osteoblasts. And the evidence indicates that endogenous PTHrP with its NLS (nuclear/nucleolar localization sequence) does stimulate VSMC proliferation (a prime prerequisite for atheroma formation and ossification) via intranuclear targets that inactivate pRb, the inhibitory G1/S checkpoint regulator, by stimulating its hyperphosphorylation. But neither externally added full-length PTHrP nor the NLS-lacking PTHrP-(1-34)OH gets into the VSMC nucleus and instead they inhibit proliferation and calcification by only activating the cell's PTHR1 receptors. No PTH has an NLS and, as expected from the observations on the externally added PTHrPs, hPTH-(1-34)OH inhibits calcification by VSMCs and cannot stimulate vascular ossification in a diabetic mouse model. Encouraging though this may be for osteoporotics with their "calcification paradox," more work is needed to be sure that the skeletally osteogenic PTHs do not promote vascular ossification with its cardiovascular consequences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular BiochemistrySame topicBone health and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207