MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968674595 · doi:10.1002/jcb.20424

Osteogenic PTHs and vascular ossification—Is there a danger for osteoporotics?

2005· review· en· W1968674595 on OpenAlexaff
J. F. Whitfield

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Biochemistry · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVascular smooth muscleOssificationCalcificationEndocrinologyInternal medicineReceptorMedicineOsteoblastCell biologyChemistryCancer researchBiologyAnatomyBiochemistryIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inflammation in vascular (mostly arterial) walls and heart valves triggered by the trans-endothelial influx of LDL particles and the action of subsequently modified (e.g., by oxidation) LDL particles can trigger true bone formation by valvar fibroblasts, by a subpopulation of re-differentiation-competent VSMCs (vascular smooth muscle cells) or by vascular pericytes. Vascular ossification can lead to heart failure and death. Elderly osteoporotic women who need osteogenic drugs to restore their lost skeletal bone are paradoxically prone to vascular ossification-the "calcification paradox." The recent introduction into the clinic of a potently osteogenic parathyroid hormone peptide, Lilly's rhPTH-(1-34)OH (Forteotrade mark), to reverse skeletal bone loss raises the question of whether this and other potently osteogenic PTHs still in clinical trial might also stimulate vascular ossification in such osteoporotic women. Indeed the VSMCs in human and rat atherosclerotic lesions hyperexpress PTHrP and the PTHR1 (or PTH1R) receptor as do maturing osteoblasts. And the evidence indicates that endogenous PTHrP with its NLS (nuclear/nucleolar localization sequence) does stimulate VSMC proliferation (a prime prerequisite for atheroma formation and ossification) via intranuclear targets that inactivate pRb, the inhibitory G1/S checkpoint regulator, by stimulating its hyperphosphorylation. But neither externally added full-length PTHrP nor the NLS-lacking PTHrP-(1-34)OH gets into the VSMC nucleus and instead they inhibit proliferation and calcification by only activating the cell's PTHR1 receptors. No PTH has an NLS and, as expected from the observations on the externally added PTHrPs, hPTH-(1-34)OH inhibits calcification by VSMCs and cannot stimulate vascular ossification in a diabetic mouse model. Encouraging though this may be for osteoporotics with their "calcification paradox," more work is needed to be sure that the skeletally osteogenic PTHs do not promote vascular ossification with its cardiovascular consequences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular BiochemistrySame topicBone health and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207