MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968694443 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0498

Identification and location of long‐term voltage instability based on branch equivalent

2013· article· en· W1968694443 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Generation Transmission & Distribution · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsBC Hydro (Canada)
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Term (time)InstabilityComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)PhysicsMechanicsBiologyArtificial intelligenceBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new branch equivalent is proposed to identify and locate long‐term voltage instability in both distribution and transmission network. In the proposed equivalent, not only the power flow and the sensitivity information remain consistent before and after the equivalence, but also the equivalent voltages and admittances are completely independent of loads, which ensure the equivalent accuracy in voltage stability analysis. Based on the proposed equivalent, an approach is presented to identify system voltage stability. The proposed approach also locates weak branches and buses, where an enhancement or operational measure can be used to improve system voltage stability. The effectiveness of the proposed equivalent and approach is demonstrated using two radial systems, five IEEE systems and four actual utility systems with a system size from 5‐buses to 3120‐buses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it