Isolation and Variation in Virulence of Single-Spore Isolates of <i>Plasmodiophora brassicae</i> from Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clubroot of crucifers, caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae, is emerging as an important disease of canola (Brassica napus) in Alberta, Canada. Populations of the pathogen often consist of a mixture of different pathotypes. Therefore, a simple and efficient method to isolate single resting spores of P. brassicae was developed, based on serial dilution of spore suspensions. The virulence of 24 single-spore isolates, representing five populations of the pathogen from Alberta, Ontario, and British Columbia, was characterized on the differentials of Williams and Somé et al. Symptoms were rated 6 weeks after inoculation and Fisher's least significant difference (P < 0.05) was used to differentiate resistant from susceptible host reactions. The pathotype composition of P. brassicae in Canada appeared more diverse when single-spore isolates were examined rather than populations of the pathogen. In Alberta, at least three and possibly four pathotypes were identified among the 14 isolates tested, whereas a maximum of only two pathotypes had been reported previously when populations of the pathogen were examined. Pathotype 3 or P2, as classified on the differentials of Williams and Somé et al., respectively, was found to be predominant in the province. The occurrence of other pathotypes at lower frequencies suggests that caution should be used in any breeding strategy, because rare pathotypes of P. brassicae may quickly become predominant if susceptible host genotypes are continuously grown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".