Stabilization of stationary excitation pulses in an open flow without long-range inhibition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study numerically and experimentally the stabilization of stationary excitation pulses in an open flow system. Since all the species have equal flow and diffusion coefficients, stabilization of stationary pulses by long-range inhibition is excluded. Upstream propagating pulses slow down as they approach the inflow boundary, where a constant forcing establishes a downstream extending subexcitable boundary layer. When the flow velocity is low, successive pulses vanish as they reach the subexcitable region. When the flow velocity is increased, the incoming pulses pile up near the inflow one after the other to form a stationary and space-periodic structure. This occurs in such a manner that the system remembers and stores the number of incoming pulses. We show that flow-induced stabilization of stationary pulses involves a mechanism by which the upstream subexcitable region and the flow cause the arrest of the pulse front and the pulse back, respectively. We discuss how the flow-stabilized structures compare to, and are different from those stabilized by a long-ranged, diffusive inhibition and from those observed in boundary-forced open flows of media showing relaxation-type oscillations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it