Tuning the Luminescence and Electroluminescence of Diphenylboron Complexes of 5-Substituted 2-(2‘-Pyridyl)indoles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To examine the effect of substituent groups on the luminescence of BPh 2 (X-2-PI) complexes, three new air-stable boron complexes BPh 2 (F-2-PI) ( 5a ), BPh 2 (Cl-2-PI) ( 5b ), and BPh 2 (CH 3 O-2-PI) ( 5c ) were synthesized and characterized, where F-2-PI = 5-fluoro-2-(2‘-pyridyl)indole, Cl-2-PI = 5-chloro-2-(2‘-pyridyl)indole, and CH 3 O-2-PI = 5-methoxyl-2-(2‘-pyridyl)indole. In these complexes, the 5-substituted 2-PI ligand chelates in a tretrahedral fashion to the boron center. Compounds 5a − c are luminescent, with 5a having the highest emission efficiency. Compared with the emission maximum of BPh 2 (2-PI) (516 nm), the emission maximum of 5a and 5b is blue-shifted to 490 and 487 nm, respectively, while the emission of 5c is red-shifted to 532 nm, indicating the possibility of tuning the luminescence of these complexes by varying the substituent groups on the 2-PI ligand. An electroluminescent device using compound 5a as the emitter and the electron transport material has been fabricated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it