Kinetic effect of single MgCl<sub>2</sub> and NaCl aqueous solutions on ethane hydrate formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experimental data on the kinetics of C2H6 hydrate formation in the presence of pure water and two aqueous single solutions, MgCl2 and NaCl, are presented in this study. The measurements of experimental hydrate formation process were performed in a high pressure reactor at 276.15 K, at initial pressure range of 2.0–2.4 MPa, and solution concentration range of 2.34–10 wt%. The effect of solution concentration and initial pressure on the induction time, gas consumption, conversion, and storage capacity and growth rate was examined. It was observed that with the increase of the solution concentration, the induction time increased, while the storage capacity and the number of moles of C2H6 consumed decreased. A diffusion-reaction kinetics model was employed to predict the hydrate growth rate at the beginning of hydrate formation. The results showed that the addition of MgCl2 and NaCl decreased the apparent rate constant, and MgCl2 had a greater effect than NaCl in inhibiting the hydrate growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".