MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clinical Accuracy of Fluoroscopic Computer-Assisted Pedicle Screw Fixation: A CT Analysis

2005· article· en· W1968760086 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFluoroscopyFixation (population genetics)Lumbosacral jointThoracic spineThoracic vertebraeNuclear medicineSurgeryRadiologyLumbar vertebraeLumbarPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Study Design. Observational cohort study with computerized tomography (CT) analysis of in vivo pedicle screw placement. Objective. To evaluate the clinical accuracy of computer-assisted fluoroscopy for the placement of thoracic and lumbosacral (LS) pedicle screws. Summary of Background Data. Computer-assisted fluoroscopy is an adjunct for the placement of pedicle screws. Methods. Postoperative CT of 360 titanium pedicle screws (281 LS [L1–S1]; 79 thoracic [T2–T12]) were independently assessed. All screws were placed using the FluoroNav™ system (Medtronic Surgical Navigation Technologies, Louisville, CO). The relative position of the screw to the pedicle was graded as follows: A = completely in; B = <2 mm breach; C = 2–4 mm breach; and D = >4 mm breach. If an osseous breach occurred, the direction of the breach was further classified. Results. Eight-five percent of screws were completely contained within the pedicle. Fifty-five-pedicle breaches (25 medial; 30 lateral) occurred. Pedicle breaches were graded B in 13.1% (47 breaches), C in 1.9% (7), and D in 0.3% (1) of screws. Pedicle breach was significantly higher in the thoracic compared to the LS spine, 31.6% (25/79) and 10.6% (30/281), respectively (P < 0.0001). In the thoracic spine, 72% of pedicle breaches were lateral. In 49% of breaches, the screw diameter was larger than the pedicle diameter. None of the pedicle breaches were associated with neurologic or other clinical sequelae. Conclusions. The clinical pedicle breach rate in this study is comparable to those reported using conventional techniques with or without fluoroscopic assistance. FluoroNav™ appears to be a safe adjunct for the placement of thoracic and LS pedicle screws. In this series of 360 pedicle screws (T2–S1) placed with the assistance of virtual fluoroscopy, 55 pedicle breaches occurred. The majority of breaches (86%) were minor (<2 mm). None of the pedicle breaches were associated with clinical sequelae. FluoroNav™ system (Medtronic Surgical Navigation Technologies, Louisville, CO) is a safe adjunct for the placement of pedicle screws.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it