MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968803183 · doi:10.1109/icdret.2009.5454208

A feasibility study of an on-grid solar home system in Bangladesh

2009· article· en· W1968803183 on OpenAlexaff
Sanjida Moury, Razzaqul Ahshan

Bibliographic record

Venue2009 1st International Conference on the Developements in Renewable Energy Technology (ICDRET) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyElectricity generationPhotovoltaic systemFossil fuelGrid parityElectric power systemEnvironmental economicsGridSolar powerEconomic shortageElectricityDistributed generationComputer scienceEngineeringBusinessPower (physics)Electrical engineeringEconomicsWaste managementGeographyGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electricity demand is now the basic need for the current civilization in every moment. Especially for the developing countries such as Bangladesh has the energy crisis and is one of the challenging issues to progress the country future. Shortage of electric power generation causes a significant amount of load shading everyday. Lack of fossil fuel reservation is a global issue. In addition, fossil fuel based power generation is not also environment friendly. Considering all these barriers, a renewable on-grid power generation system can be a better option for Bangladesh. This paper presents the feasibility study of an on-grid solar power generation system for a typical house in Bangladesh. The load demand of a house in Dhaka city is taken as a case to perform this study. The proposed solar home system is simulated in HOMER and the detail analysis, system description and results are presented in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2009 1st International Conference on the Developements in Renewable Energy Technology (ICDRET)Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207