MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968809051 · doi:10.1145/384101.384111

Computing all factorizations in ***

2001· article· en· W1968809051 on OpenAlexaff
Howard Cheng, George Labahn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFactorizationUnique factorization domainDiscriminantMultiplication (music)Prime (order theory)Time complexityMathematicsFactorization of polynomialsPrime factorPolynomialDomain (mathematical analysis)Dixon's factorization methodCombinatoricsDegree (music)Computational complexity theoryDiscrete mathematicsComputer scienceAlgorithmMatrix polynomialArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new algorithm for determining all factorizations of a polynomial f in the domain ZN[x], a non-unique factorization domain, given in terms of parameters. From the prime factorization of N, the problem is reduced to factorization in Zph[x] where p is a prime and k ⪈ 1. If pk does not divide the discriminant of f and one factorization is given, our algorithm determines all factorizations with complexity Ο(n3 M(k log p)) where n denotes the degree of the input polynomial and M(t) denotes the complexity of multiplication of two t-bit numbers. Our algorithm improves on the method of von zur Gathen and Hartlieb, which has complexity Ο(n7 k(klog p + log n2). The improvement is achieved by processing all factors at the same time instead of one at a time and by computing the kernels and determinants of matrices over Zpk in an efficient manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207