MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968810733 · doi:10.1002/rra.1314

The effects of flow regulation and climatic variability on obstructed drainage and reverse flow contribution in a Northern river–lake–Delta complex, Mackenzie basin headwaters

2009· article· en· W1968810733 on OpenAlexaffabout
Daniel L. Peters, J. M. Buttle

Bibliographic record

VenueRiver Research and Applications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsImpactTrent UniversityUniversity of VictoriaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutflowHydrology (agriculture)DeltaDrainage basinGeologyFlow (mathematics)Environmental scienceStage (stratigraphy)STREAMSWater levelStructural basinSpring (device)StreamflowGeomorphologyOceanographyGeographyPaleontologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A distinctive hydrological feature of the Lake Athabasca–Peace–Athabasca Delta (LA‐PAD) complex is that flow in channels that drain the system reverses direction when stage on the Peace River exceeds that for the central lakes. This river's hydrology has experienced natural and human induced changes since 1968. This study investigates the importance of spring break‐up and open‐water induced outflow obstruction and reverse flow contributions to annual lake level maxima under natural (1960–1967), regulated (1976–2004) and naturalized (1976–1996) flow regimes. Obstructed and reverse flow events during spring break‐up were common prior to and following flow regulation, suggesting that natural climatic variability in source areas below the W.A.C. Bennett Dam exerted a strong influence on their occurrence. Antecedent hydrological conditions, such as fall freeze‐up lake level, break‐up magnitude, peak spring flow and initial open‐water lake level were significantly associated with annual lake level maxima. During the summer period, lake level was linked to sustained high flows on the Peace River. The river obstructed outflow and contributed reverse flow to the LA‐PAD in each year prior to 1968. Following regulation, however, more than half the years did not experience any open‐water obstruction and/or reversal, and those that did were characterized by smaller events. The average estimated duration of obstruction was more than two weeks shorter and reverse flow volume was reduced by ∼90% under a regulated regime compared to a simulated naturalized flow regime. This implied a lowered potential for lateral lake expansion into the delta floodplain in some years. The regulated hydrology could produce large stormflow and high lake levels, but only under extreme climatic events in areas below the dam and/or human‐induced alterations to normal reservoir operation. Copyright © 2009 Crown in the right of Canada and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRiver Research and ApplicationsSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207