MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer's Disease A Role in Amyloid Catabolism

2000· review· en· W1968866732 on OpenAlexaff
Judes Poirier

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApolipoprotein EEndocrinologyInternal medicineLDL receptorAmyloid precursor proteinCholesterolSynaptogenesisApolipoprotein BNeurodegenerationBiologyAlzheimer's diseaseChemistryCell biologyLipoproteinMedicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been shown over the past few years that apolipoprotein E (apoE) plays a central role in the brain response to injury and neurodegeneration in mammalian species. The coordinated expression of apoE and its different receptors, the so-called LDL receptor family, appears to regulate the transport of cholesterol and phospholipids during the early and middle phases of the reinnervation in the adult mammalian brain. As neurons undergo dendritic remodelling and synaptogenesis using cholesterol internalization through the apoE/LDL receptor pathway, they progressively shut down 3,3-hydroxymethylglutaryl-Coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase activity, the rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of cholesterol. These results suggest that cholesterol delivery and synthesis in the brain are tightly regulated through an apoE-dependent mechanism. The discovery that the apolipoprotein e4 allele is strongly linked to both sporadic and familial late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) has raised the possibility that a dysfunction of lipid transport could explain the poor compensatory synaptogenesis reported by several independent research groups in the brain of AD subjects. Recently, it has been shown that alterations of cholesterol homeostasis in the brain by exogenous administration of dietary cholesterol, or through inhibition of cholesterol synthesis, markedly affect beta amyloid production (1-40 and 1-42) and deposition and significantly impair amyloid precursor protein (APP) metabolism. In vivo, it has been shown that breeding of APP-overexpressing mice with apoE knockout mice completely abolishes amyloid plaque deposition in the brain of hybrid animals, without affecting beta amyloid steady state levels. Conversely, introduction of the human apoE3 and apoE4 genes in APP-overexpressing mice drastically reduced beta amyloid deposition in the brain of hybrid mice, confirming the proposed biological role of apoE in the clearance of extracellular beta amyloid. These results indicate that lipid homeostasis is controlled in large part by the apoE lipoprotein transport system in the extracellular space, whereas alterations in intracellular lipid homeostasis markedly affect APP processing, beta amyloid production and plaque formation in vivo. The convergence of the so-called amyloid cascade hypothesis (Hardy et al., 1992) and of the apoE/lipid recycling cascade model (Poirier, 1994) is consistent with the notion that alterations in lipid homeostasis could serve as the common denominator for apoE and beta amyloid dysfunctions in Alzheimer's disease. It is also interesting to note that lipid homeostasis is also a central feature of one of the most important neurotransmitter systems in the brain: the cholinergic system. This system is unique in the CNS since it relies heavily on lipid bioavailability to locally synthesize acetylcholine. It is thus quite tempting to propose that two of the most common neuropathologic landmarks of AD--namely, cholinergic dysfunction and amyloid deposition--may in fact depend on the integrity of local lipid homeostatic processes, which in turn are strongly dependent upon proper lipid delivery by the apoE transport system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations172
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207