MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968875587 · doi:10.2495/safe-v1-n4-438-461

Stability of the new alluvial fan of el partido stream, located in the eastern side of el rocío village in the doñana national park (spain), after the actions carried out to restore its hydrological regime

2011· article· en· W1968875587 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Julio Aguirre, José Carlos Robredo Sánchez, Carlos de Gonzalo Aranoa, P. Huelin Rueda

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical and socio-economic studies of Spain and related regions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlluvial fanNational parkGeographyAlluviumArchaeologyGeologyGeomorphologyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present, fi rst of fall, a recall of the formation of a new alluvial fan at El Partido stream between 1982 and 2006, located in the eastern side of El Rocío village, over the Doñana National Park Marshes, as a result of the channelization of the mentioned stream with crop purposes in 1981. The settlement of the new alluvial fan, over an area of special protection, and the concerns linked to its expansion and growth, hindering the drainage of the urbanized area of El Rocío village after fl ood events, caused a strong impact. The analysis of the situation drove to the conclusion that the most suitable measure to stabilize the new alluvial fan was to restore the functionality of the former alluvial fan located upstream the study area. The restoration works were executed in 2006 and from the year 2007 the monitoring of its behavior in several fl ood events that occurred in the stream has been carried out. This paper sum-marizes the followed restoration scheme of the former alluvial fan and describes the main monitoring tasks, especially during the last 2 years focused specifi cally in the neighborhood of El Rocío village. To conclude, a description of the recent fl ood behavior along the fi nal reach of the stream, as a result of the restoring works and its impact on the current stability of the new alluvial fan has been provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicHistorical and socio-economic studies of Spain and related regionsFrench-language works237,207