MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968887010 · doi:10.1080/0965254x.2012.746998

Cell phone product-market segments using product features as a cluster variate: a multi-country study

2013· article· en· W1968887010 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matti Haverila, Michel Rod, Nicholas J. Ashill

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Strategic Marketing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhoneMarket segmentationProduct (mathematics)MarketingResidenceBusinessExploratory researchChinaCluster (spacecraft)EconomicsDemographic economicsComputer scienceGeographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acknowledging the importance of hybrid bases for segmenting international markets and drawing upon means–ends chain theory, this study investigates the existence of inter-market product-market segments among adolescents and young adult cell phone consumers across five country markets. On the basis of exploratory research aiming to identify a comprehensive list of cell phone features we examine the existence of inter-market segments using these feature preferences as the cluster variate. Data were gathered from 403 high school and 892 undergraduate students in Finland, UAE, China, Canada and New Zealand. The results of a two-step cluster analysis approach suggest the inter-market segments do exist in these five countries, but their existence varies to some degree from country to country. These clusters were then profiled with gender, country of residence and frequency of usage of certain cell phone functions as background variables. The paper concludes with a discussion of managerial implications and directions for future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Strategic MarketingSame topicCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyFrench-language works237,207