MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968926392 · doi:10.1149/05806.0231ecst

Cryogenic Single-Component Micro-Nano Solid Nitrogen Particle Production Using Laval Nozzle for Physical Resist Removal-Cleaning Process

2013· article· en· W1968926392 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jun Ishimoto, U Oh, Tomoki Koike, Naoya Ochiai

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInjection Molding Process and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Science and Technology Agency
KeywordsNozzleSubcoolingMaterials scienceResistParticle (ecology)Adiabatic processLiquid nitrogenWaferMechanicsNanotechnologyChemistryMechanical engineeringThermodynamicsHeat transferEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The innovative characteristics of the cryogenic single-component micro-nano solid nitrogen (SN2) particle production using super adiabatic Laval nozzle and its application to the physical resist removal-cleaning process are investigated by a new type of integrated measurement coupled computational technique. The originality to be noted in the present study is that the continuous production of micro-nano SN2 particle is achieved by using single component gas-liquid two-phase flow of subcooled nitrogen through a Laval nozzle (converging-diverging nozzle). As a result of present computation, it is found that high-speed ultra-fine SN2 particle is continuously generated due to the freezing of liquid nitrogen (LN2) droplet induced by rapid adiabatic expansion of subsonic subcooled two-phase subcooled nitrogen flow passing through the Laval nozzle. Furthermore, the effect of SN2 particle diameter, injection velocity, and attack angle to the wafer substrate on resist removal-cleaning performance is investigated in detail by integrated measurement coupled computational technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicInjection Molding Process and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207