Phenotypic Changes among Hybrid Rat Mast Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rat peritoneal mast cells and 6-thioguanine-resistant rat basophilic leukemia cells, representative of connective tissue-type (CTMC) and mucosal (MMC) mast cells, respectively, were fused using polyethylene glycol. Four out of 14 primary hybrid mast cell lines contained more than 50% of CTMC as demonstrated by histochemical staining. Two cell lines, one predominantly of the CTMC and the other of the MMC phenotype, were selected for further study. Among these, the phenotype was also confirmed by analysis for rat mast cell protease I and by mediator release triggered by compound 48/80 and ionophore A23187. The CTMC phenotype disappeared after culturing cells for 2 weeks. The change in phenotype did not significantly alter the mediator release due to calcium ionophore A23187. Repeated cloning of cells bearing the CTMC phenotype did not yield a cloned line of cells expressing the CTMC phenotype only, although it prolonged the persistence of this phenotype. During the period of CTMC phenotype loss, a drop in cellular DNA content occurred, suggesting that chromosome instability may, at least partially, have been responsible for the phenotypic changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".