Embryonic and fetal rat myoblasts form different muscle fiber types in an ectopic in vivo environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Limb muscle development is characterized by the migration of muscle precursor cells from the somite followed by myoblast differentiation and the maturation of myotubes into distinct muscle fiber types. Previous in vitro experiments have suggested that rat limb myoblasts are composed of at least two distinct myoblast subpopulations that appear in the developing hindlimb at different developmental stages. These embryonic and fetal myoblast subpopulations are believed to generate primary and secondary myotubes, respectively. To test this hypothesis, cells obtained from embryonic day 14 (ED 14) and ED 20 rat hindlimbs were analyzed for myosin heavy chain expression after long-term differentiation in adult rat brains. Fetal myoblasts from ED 20 hindlimbs produced muscle fibers with a phenotype similar to that seen in tissue culture--predominantly fast myosin with a small proportion also coexpressing slow myosin. However, injection sites populated by embryonic myoblasts from ED 14 hindlimbs produced a different phenotype from that previously reported in culture, with fibers expressing an entire array of myosin isoforms. In addition, a subpopulation of fibers expressing exclusively slow myosin was found only in the embryonic injection sites. Our results support the existence of at least three myogenic subpopulations in early rat limb buds with only one exhibiting the capability to differentiate in vitro. These findings are consistent with a model of muscle fiber type development in which the fiber type potential of myoblast populations is established before differentiation into myotubes. This process establishes myogenic subpopulations that have restricted adaptive ranges regulated by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".