Development of asymmetry in the caenogastropods <i>Amphissa columbiana</i> and <i>Euspira lewisii</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The asymmetry displayed by the body plan of gastropods has been directly or indirectly attributed to an evolutionary process called torsion. Torsion is defined as a rotation of 180° between the cephalopodium (head and foot) and visceropallium (visceral organs, mantle, mantle cavity, and shell). During development, the displacement of anatomical components occurs during a process called “ontogenetic torsion.” Although ontogenetic torsion is central to theories of gastropod evolution, surprisingly few studies have documented actual tissue movements during the development of asymmetry in gastropods. We investigated the development of the mantle cavity and pleurovisceral nerve connective (visceral nerve loop) in the caenogastropods Amphissa columbiana and Euspira lewisii, because displacements of both of these structures are interpreted as major consequences of torsion. Scanning electron micrographs, histological sections, and immunofluorescence images showed that the developing vis‐ceropallium twists by 90° relative to the cephalopodium, the mantle cavity initially forms on the right side, and displacements of the visceral nerve loop become evident on the left side before the right side. A developmental stage in which the mantle cavity is confined to the right side has also been reported in members of the Vetigastropoda and Heterobranchia. We suggest that further comparative studies should test the hypothesis that early development throughout the Gastropoda converges on an embryonic organization in which the mantle cavity and anus are located laterally, despite clade‐specific differences in developmental patterns both before and after this stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".