MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1968994832 · doi:10.1139/e04-059

<i>Lusitanisuchus</i>, a new generic name for <i>Lisboasaurus mitracostatus</i> (Crocodylomorpha: Mesoeucrocodylia), with a description of new remains from the Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) and Lower Cretaceous (Berriasian) of Portugal

2004· article· en· W1968994832 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniela Schwarz, Regina Fechner

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFreie Universität Berlin
KeywordsCretaceousPaleontologyGeologyTaxonSkullStructural basinPortuguesePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lusitanisuchus mitracostatus is a small mesoeucrocodilian crocodylomorph from the Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) of Guimarota–Leiria in Portugal, which was originally described as an anguimorph lizard (Lisboasaurus mitracostatus Seiffert, 1970) based on jaw fragments and isolated teeth. A recent reexamination of the crocodylomorph material of Guimarota yielded new skull and dentary remains assignable to Lusitanisuchus mitracostatus. The new skull material not only enables for the first time a skull reconstruction of this taxon, but also leads to renaming and reclassifying Lisboasaurus mitracostatus. Teeth of Lusitanisuchus are also reported from the locality Porto Dinheiro–Lourinhã, Early Cretaceous (Berriasian) of Portugal. The presence of this crocodylomorph taxon in two Portuguese localities suggests its occurence in the Lusitanian Basin during the Kimmeridgian to the Berriasian.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207