Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have performed simple simulations which suggest that the phase-space structure of halos identified in cosmological calculations is invariant under the dynamics induced by sinking substructure satellites. This contention is confirmed using a two-component Fokker-Planck formulation, representing the dynamics of a smooth background and a system of massive clumps. It is shown that, to very high accuracy, when the clumps sink in under the action of dynamical friction, the background expands so as to leave the total distribution unchanged. This holds for the inner and intermediate regions of isotropic systems in dynamical equilibrium, and is valid for any mass spectrum of substructure, because the governing equation is linear in their mass-weighted phase-space distribution. If the clumps are considered solid, the process whereby background particles are driven out of low-energy states takes the form of an exponential instability, with a characteristic timescale on the order of the dynamical friction time, on which develops a low-energy cutoff in the phase-space distribution of these lighter particles and a constant-density core in their spatial distribution. This could correspond to a situation in which the clumps are made of dense baryonic material. We also considered the case when stripping is strong enough for a low-energy cutoff to develop in the clump distribution (as in the situation with dissipationless substructure). The results of this paper suggest that halo profiles similar to those found in dissipationless cosmological simulations are approximately invariant under the interaction induced by the presence of substructure, a necessary condition for the observed "universality." In addition, the total profile, including baryons, should also be invariant, provided that the latter are initially in the form of dense clumps, whose distribution initially follows that of dark matter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".