MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969065138 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v3n4p99

Optimization of Launched Parameters of the Railgun with Internal Penalty Function Method

2011· article· en· W1969065138 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wen Liu, Haijun Zhang, Bai Xiang-zhong, Leilei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRailgunArmature (electrical engineering)ProjectileLaunchedDragTrajectory of a projectileProjectile motionMechanicsAerospace engineeringPhysicsComputer scienceSimulationEngineeringMechanical engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The launched speed of projectile is one of the most important parameters in the design of railgun, in order to explore the influence of the launched speed of projectile by the length of rail and the driving current. Therefore, it is meaningful that gets the optimum speed of projectile. In this paper, main resistances (plasma viscous drag, inertial drag and air drag) was full considered in the motion process of plasma armature, and the optimization model includes the speed of the armature,driving current and the length of rail were build,then it was optimization calculated with internal penalty function method. The optimization result shows that the launched speed of projectile is maximum when the driving current and the length of rail are fixed value. The purpose lies in adjusting the width and the length of the rail and the distance between two rails so as to adjust the launched speed of projectile. The result of research laid a theoretical foundation for designing and manufacture of the railguns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicElectromagnetic Launch and Propulsion TechnologyFrench-language works237,207