MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969074160 · doi:10.1103/physreve.70.056406

Theoretical study of laser-excited Mach cones in dusty plasmas

2004· article· en· W1969074160 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDust and Plasma Wave Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMach numberSupersonic speedMach wavePhysicsLaserPlasmaMechanicsTransverse planePerpendicularMach reflectionOpticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A two-dimensional hydrodynamic model for a monolayer of dust particles is used to study the Mach cones excited by a moving laser beam through dusty plasmas. Numerical results for the density perturbation and the velocity distribution of dust particles exhibit both compressional and shear-wave Mach cones. It is found that the compressional Mach cones exist in cases of both supersonic and subsonic excitations, and that they consist of multiple lateral or transverse wakes. On the other hand, realization of single shear-wave Mach cones depends closely on the excitation technique, the laser scanning speed, and the discharge pressures. It is found that, when the scanning direction of the laser beam is perpendicular to the laser force, a transition from multiple compressional Mach cones to a single shear Mach cone can be achieved either by lowering the scanning speed or by increasing the discharge pressures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it