MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969081822 · doi:10.1109/icpr.2014.371

Neural Network Based Image Modification for Shape from Observed SEM Images

2014· article· en· W1969081822 on OpenAlexaff
Yuji Iwahori, Kenji Funahashi, Robert J. Woodham, M. K. Bhuyan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)Computer visionArtificial neural networkComputer scienceScanning electron microscopeRotation (mathematics)Eikonal equationFast marching methodMathematicsOpticsPhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new approach to recover 3-D shape from a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) image is described. With an ideal SEM image, 3-D shape can be recovered using the Fast Marching Method (FMM) applied to the Eikonal equation. However, when the light source direction is oblique, the correct shape cannot be obtained by the usual one-pass FMM. The new approach modifies the intensities in the original SEM image using an additional SEM image of a sphere and Neural Network (NN) training. Image modification is a two degree-of-freedom (DOF) rotation. No assumption is made about the specific functional form for intensity in an SEM image. The correct 3-D shape can be obtained using the FMM and NN learning, without iteration. The approach is demonstrated through computer simulation and validated through real experiment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical measurement and interference techniquesFrench-language works237,207