MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969097684 · doi:10.1139/w04-126

Expression of the<i>cry11A</i>gene of<i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i>ssp.<i>israelensis</i>in<i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>

2005· article· en· W1969097684 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rodolfo Quintana‐Castro, Montserrat Ramírez-Suero, Fernando Moreno-Sanz, Mario Ramírez‐Lepe

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsBacillus thuringiensisSaccharomyces cerevisiaeBiologyGeneMicrobiologyBacillalesBacillaceaeGeneticsGene expressionBacteriaBacillus subtilis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complete cry11A region gene of Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. israelensis was fused in frame to the 3' end of the GST gene under the control of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HXK1 promoter. The fusion protein GST-cry11A was expressed in S. cerevisiae strain AMW13C+. The fusion gene GST-cry11A was expressed when yeast cells were grown on galactose and a nonfermentable medium containing ethanol as carbon and energy source. When the cells were grown in glucose, mannose, fructose, or glycerol as carbon sources, the GST-cry11A gene was repressed. Thus, a regulated expression in accordance with the regulatory activity of the HXK1 gene promoter has been detected. The GST-cry11A fusion protein was detected in the transformed yeasts as a soluble protein. The fusion protein was purified by affinity chromatography using glutathione-Sepharose beads. Cell-free extracts from transformed yeasts grown in ethanol-containing culture media showed insecticidal activity against third-instar Aedes aegypti larvae. This insecticidal activity was increased about 4-fold when the purified fusion protein was assayed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207