Copy Number Variation of Testis-Specific Protein, Y-Encoded <i>(TSPY)</i> in 14 Different Breeds of Cattle <i>(Bos taurus)</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multi-copied gene families are prevalent in mammalian genomes, especially within the Y chromosome. Testis specific protein Y-encoded (TSPY) is present in variable copy number in many mammalian species. Previous studies have estimated that TSPY ranges from 50-200 copies in cattle. To examine TSPY localization on the Y chromosome we employed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and fiber-FISH. The results show a strong signal on the short arm of the Y chromosome (Yp). To investigate TSPY copy number we used relative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to analyze the DNA of 14 different cattle breeds. Variation both within and between breeds was observed. All breeds show significant variation in TSPY copy number among individual members. Brown Swiss (161 copies, CI = 133-195) had higher average levels of TSPY and Western Fjord Cattle (63 copies, CI = 45-86) had lower levels than some breeds. Overall, however, most breeds had a similar average TSPY copy number. The pooled average was 94 copies (CI = 88-100). The significance of the TSPY array remains uncertain, but as the function of TSPY is unraveled the purpose of the array may become clearer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it