MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969119659 · doi:10.1300/j149v03n04_03

Application of a Balanced Satiation Model to Meal Bundle Utility

2002· article· en· W1969119659 on OpenAlexaff
Joachim E. Barth, Vithala R. Rao

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Retail Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBundleSimple (philosophy)EconometricsMathematicsComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The consumer's utility for a bundle can be more than, equal to, or less than the sum of the individual item utilities (the simple additive model of subset utility). A hybrid “Balanced Attribute Satiation” model was proposed that incorporated both Balance model, Farquhar and Rao (1976), and Attribute Satiation model, McAlister (1978), terms. An empirical study involving 63 combinations of items drawn from a simple restaurant menu of 12 food items (sandwiches, side orders and desserts) was administered to 211 subjects. It was found that the hybrid Balanced Attribute Satiation model had better model fit and prediction ability than the other competing models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Hospitality & Tourism AdministrationSame topicConsumer Retail Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207