MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Differential modulation of rod and cone calcium currents in tiger salamander retina by D2 dopamine receptors and cAMP

2000· article· en· W1969145740 on OpenAlexfundno aff
S Stella, Wallace B. Thoreson

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Neuroscience · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Eye InstituteYork UniversityResearch to Prevent Blindness
KeywordsQuinpiroleDopamineAgonistBiologyDopamine receptor D2BiophysicsDopamine receptorForskolinEndocrinologyRetinaInternal medicineReceptorChemistryNeuroscienceCell biologyBiochemistryStimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synaptic transmission from vertebrate photoreceptors involves activation of L-type calcium currents (ICa). Dopamine is an important circadian neuromodulator in the retina and photoreceptors possess D2 dopamine receptors. We examined modulation of ICa by dopamine and cAMP in retinal slices and isolated cells of larval tiger salamander. Results show that dopamine and a D2 agonist, quinpirole, enhanced ICa in rods and red-, blue- and UV-sensitive small single cones but inhibited ICa in red-sensitive large single cones. A D1 agonist, SKF-38393, was without effect. Quinpirole effects were blocked by pertussis toxin (PTx) pretreatment indicating involvement of PTx-sensitive G-proteins. Like dopamine, inhibition of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) by Rp-cAMPS enhanced ICa in rods and small single cones, but inhibited ICa in large single cones. In contrast, forskolin and Sp-cAMPS, which stimulate PKA, inhibited ICa in rods and small single cones but enhanced ICa in large single cones. Sp-cAMPS also occluded effects of quinpirole. These results suggest that D2 receptors modulate ICa via inhibition of cAMP. Differences among the responses of photoreceptors to cAMP are consistent with the possibility that small single cones and rods may possess different Ca2+ channel subtypes than large single cones. The results with dopamine and quinpirole showing inhibition of ICa in large single cones and enhancement of rod ICa were unexpected because previous studies have shown that dopamine suppresses rod inputs and enhances cone inputs into second-order neurons. The present results therefore indicate that the dopaminergic enhancement of cone inputs does not arise from modulation of photoreceptor ICa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of NeuroscienceSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207