Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper discusses an art installation, which creates a merged environment between physical and virtual realities in the form of a figurative sculpture. Our artistic explorations of the human body unveil the impact of technology on changing perception of the ideal and real body. We explore the perception of the body with projected virtual sculpture on the surface of three-foot-wide wax reproduction of a breast. The hybrid wax-and-projection sculptural object serves as an invitation to reflect on issues surrounding human body appearance. The shape of the projection surface comes from a three-dimensional scan, an array of sensors estimates the position of an observer to the sculpture, and the projected model subtly references a mammary gland. Thus, rendered correctly for the observer's perspective, the virtual sculpture appears embedded within the projection surface. The resulting object combines mathematically enlarged physical copy of the breast with the fictional projected anatomy, which exposes the confusion between virtual and physical, and impossibility to set a threshold between natural and artificial in the appearance of a body. Our work applies mixed reality to the dynamic sculptural installation to discus how technology redefines physical and psychological boundaries of a human body.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".