Mechanism of DNA Recognition at a Viral Replication Origin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recognition of the DNA origin by the Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) protein is the primary event in latentphase genome replication of the Epstein-Barr virus, a model for replication initiation in eukaryotes. We carried out an extensive thermodynamic and kinetic characterization of the binding mechanism of the DNA binding domain of EBNA1, EBNA1452-641, to a DNA fragment containing a single specific origin site. The interaction displays a binding energy of 12.7 kcal mol-1, with 11.9 kcal mol-1 coming from the enthalpic change with a minimal entropic contribution. Formation of the EBNA1452-641.DNA complex is accompanied by a heat capacity change of -1.22 kcal mol-1 K-1, a very large value considering the surface area buried, which we assign to an unusually apolar protein-DNA interface. Kinetic dissociation experiments, including fluorescence anisotropy and a continuous native electrophoretic mobility shift assay, confirmed that two EBNA1.DNA complex conformers are in slow equilibrium; one dissociates slowly (t1/2 approximately 41 min) through an undissociated intermediate species and the other corresponds to a fast twostep dissociation route (t1/2 approximately 0.8 min). In line with this, at least two parallel association events from two populations of protein conformers are observed, with on-rates of 0.25-1.6x10(8) m-1 s-1, which occur differentially either in excess protein or DNA molecules. Both parallel complexes undergo subsequent firstorder rearrangements of approximately 2.0 s-1 to yield two consolidated complexes. These parallel association and dissociation routes likely allow additional flexible regulatory events for site recognition depending on site availability according to nucleus environmental conditions, which may lock a final recognition event, dissociate and re-bind, or slide along the DNA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".