Preclinical Study of the Novel Vascular Occluding Agent, WST11, for Photodynamic Therapy of the Canine Prostate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Vascular targeted photodynamic therapy with WST09 shows promise for recurrent prostate cancer after radiation but hydrophobicity in aqueous solutions limited application. We tested the safety and efficacy of WST11, a novel water soluble vascular occluding agent, for vascular targeted photodynamic therapy of the dog prostate and compared it to WST09 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Optical fibers were inserted in the prostate and connected to diode lasers. WST11 (Steba Biotech, Cedex, France) at varying doses, including a drug control with no light in 34 dogs, and WST09 (Steba Biotech) (2 mg/kg) in 3 dogs were infused during 10 minutes. Illumination was initiated at 5 or 10 minutes, and lasted up to 33.2 minutes based on laser fluence and delivered energy. Blood was collected for analysis and pharmacokinetics. The end point was at 1 week. RESULTS: No vascular targeted photodynamic therapy associated change was observed in blood pressure or blood test values. Circulating WST11 increased with drug infusion and decreased rapidly during 1 hour to reach undetectable levels by 24 hours. All except 1 dog with bowel intussusception did well after vascular targeted photodynamic therapy with only mild urinary symptoms that resolved within 24 to 48 hours. Lung and liver were normal. Hemorrhage was present in all prostates except controls. This translated into necrosis at a WST11 threshold and within a window of doses at fixed illumination. Necrosis was associated with loss of the vessel endothelial layer. Fluence highly impacted necrosis. WST11 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy was advantageously comparable to WST09 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy, and optimally ablated about 5.0 cm(3) of tissue per lobe and about 10 cm(3) of the whole prostate. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy of WST11 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy in the dog prostate support clinical applications for prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".