ANÁLISE DOS DIZERES DE ROTULAGEM DE PRODUTOS COSMÉTICOS FOTOPROTETORES, SOB AS EXIGÊNCIAS LEGAIS VIGENTES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O uso de fotoprotetores é exaltado durante a estação sazonal verão, quando a busca pela pigmentação cutânea através da exposição ao sol torna-se maior. A proteção da pele contra a irradiação solar se faz importante sobretudo para evitar a incidência de efeitos eritematógenos, queimaduras solares, carcinomas e melanomas cutâneos, e fotoenvelhecimento. No entanto, a orientação profissional quanto ao uso correto deste produto é praticamente inexistente, cabendo ao usuário a responsabilidade sobre a escolha, aquisição e uso. Assim, evidencia-se a importância da presença de informações relativas aos produtos e seu uso, nos dizeres de rotulagem de cada produto, em cumprimento às exigências da legislação sanitária. Para verificar o cumprimento da regulamentação em questão, fez-se um levantamento das informações contidas em rótulos de produtos fotoprotetores, tendo como foco principal, aquelas consideradas obrigatórias pela legislação. Após análise percentual, verificou-se que os dizeres de rotulagem, em alguns produtos, apresentam falhas no que diz respeito às informações importantes para a garantia da escolha e do seu uso correto e seguro. Neste contexto destaca-se a orientação do farmacêutico durante o atendimento ao público, dentro da prática da Atenção Farmacêutica. ANALYSIS OF PHOTOPROTECTION COSMETIC PRODUCTS LABELS INFORMATION UNDER THE EFFECTIVE LEGAL DEMANDS Abstract The photoprotectors use are exalted during Summer, when searching skin pigmentation by sun exposure is increased. Skin protection for sun radiation is important especially to avoid eritematogenous efects, sun burning, skin carcinoma and melanoma, and photoaging incidence. However professional guidance about right using of these products is decreased, bringing responsability about correct using and acquisition to consumer. This increases using and recommendation information presence at photoprotector labels importance, obeying to Colleged Directory Resolution 237/2002 Sanitary Vigilance National Agency. This rules fulfilment was verified by photoprotection products labels information checking, on a way of consider obligatory items. Statistics analysis shows up fails in giving important information for correct production. This context emphasize pharmaceutical guidance in Pharmaceutical Care. Pharmacist is health professional who has on training interface with users. In this way, contributes in community health keeping and life conditions improvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".