Internal sphincterotomy is superior to topical nitroglycerin in the treatment of chronic anal fissure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of topical nitroglycerin with internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic chronic anal fissures were randomly assigned to 0.25 percent nitroglycerin tid or internal sphincterotomy. Both groups received stool softeners and fiber supplements and were assessed at six weeks and six months. RESULTS: Ninety patients were accrued, but 8 were excluded from the analysis because they refused internal sphincterotomy after randomization (6), the fissure healed before surgery (1), or a fissure was not observed at surgery (1). There were 38 patients in the internal sphincterotomy group (22 males; mean age, 40.3 years) and 44 patients in the nitroglycerin group (15 males; mean age, 38.7 years). At six weeks 34 patients (89.5 percent) in the internal sphincterotomy group compared with 13 patients (29.5 percent) in the nitroglycerin group had complete healing of the fissure (P = 5x10(-8)). Five of the 13 patients in the nitroglycerin group relapsed, whereas none in the internal sphincterotomy group did. At six months fissures in 35 (92.1 percent) patients in the internal sphincterotomy group compared with 12 (27.2 percent) patients in the nitroglycerin group had healed (P = 3x10(-9)). One (2.6 percent) patient in the internal sphincterotomy group required further surgery for a superficial fistula compared with 20 (45.4 percent) patients in the nitroglycerin group who required an internal sphincterotomy (P = 9x10(-6)). Eleven (28.9 percent) patients in the internal sphincterotomy group developed side effects compared with 37 (84 percent) patients in the nitroglycerin group (P<0.0001). Nine (20.5 percent) patients discontinued the nitroglycerin because of headaches (8) or a severe syncopal attack (1). CONCLUSIONS: Internal sphincterotomy is superior to topical nitroglycerin 0.25 percent in the treatment of chronic anal fissure, with a high rate of healing, few side effects, and low risk of early incontinence. Thus, internal sphincterotomy remains the treatment of choice for chronic anal fissure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".