Анархическая историческая мысль первой четверти XX столетия
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the article The Anarchical historic idea in the first quarter of the twentieth century by Novoselov G.V. the matter is about one of the most discrepant currents of social and political view of this period in Russia. In spite of the fact that the supporters of the state free system of the society could not create a single party, you can say with the firm belief about the activization of anarchist movement in Russia during this period. And it depended on the features of their world outlook. At the same time the beginning of the twentieth century became the time of the most profound crisis in the anarchist outlook. This crisis had both external and internal reasons. The author of the article defines three basic schools which were marked out in the anarchism during the first decade of the twentieth century. They were the anarcho communism, the anarcho individualism and the anarcho syndicalism. The author also shows how the representatives of these schools tried not only to prove the theoretical sights, but also to find a way out of the crisis that captured the doctrine. It is impressively shown in the historic concepts of the theorists of the Russian anarchism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".