Integrando Habermas, Piaget e Grize: contribuições para uma Teoria Construtivista-Crítica da Comunicação
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Apresentamos, nesse artigo, a teoria construtivista-crítica da comunicação que chamamos de ecologia dos sentidos e a metodologia para a sua instrumentalização, que integra as propostas da semiótica construtivista-crítica e da pesquisa açãoengajada. Exploramos essas contribuições para o entendimento do processo de comunicação, apresentando seus fundamentos conceituais, encontrados em aspectos teóricos da filosofia de Habermas, da epistemologia genética de Piaget e da teoria da esquematização e da lógica natural de Grize. Expomos os princípios de base da teoria comunicativa e do método que propomos justificando sua pertinência e aplicação em estudo de processos comunicativos contemporâneos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it