Les actualisations d’un idéal théâtral au Théâtre du Peuple – Maurice Pottecher
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore les liens entre activité mémorielle et construction d’une identité collective au Théâtre du Peuple, théâtre reconnu comme la plus ancienne entreprise de théâtre populaire en France et faisant preuve d’une longévité remarquable. En se concentrant sur l’histoire du théâtre depuis le décès de son fondateur en 1960, il montre comment la figure de Maurice Pottecher est restée une référence permanente, en même temps que son projet a fait l’objet de diverses relectures. Celles-ci ont permis de redéfinir les éléments identitaires forts de ce lieu, remplaçant le répertoire par le public et rappelant l’importance de la dimension artistique, tout en insistant sur l’originalité de cette entreprise et son esprit si particulier. Ceux-ci sont associés à l’intuition originelle de Maurice Pottecher et l’idéal qu’il a défendu reste revendiqué : il permet le maintien de la singularité de ce théâtre dans le champ théâtral actuel et soude ceux, très divers, qui prennent part à cette aventure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".