Compositional nutrient diagnosis of corn using the Mahalanobis distance as nutrient imbalance index
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compositional nutrient diagnosis (CND) provides a plant nutrient imbalance index (CND - r 2 ) with assumed χ 2 distribution. The Mahalanobis distance D 2 , which detects outliers in compositional data sets, has a χ 2 distribution. The objective of this paper was to compare D 2 and CND – r 2 nutrient imbalance indexes in corn (Zea mays L.). We measured grain yield as well as N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn concentrations in the ear leaf at silk stage for 210 calibration sites in the St. Lawrence Lowlands [2300–2700 corn thermal units (CTU)] as well as 30 phosphorus (2300–2700 CTU; 10 sites) and 10 nitrogen (1900–2100 CTU; one site) replicated fertilizer treatments for validation. We derived CND norms as mean, standard deviation, and the inverse covariance matrix of centred log ratios (clr) for high yielding specimens (≥9.0 Mg grain ha–1 at 150 g H2O kg–1 moisture content) in the 2300–2700 CTU zone. Using χ 2 = 17 (P < 0.05) with nine degrees of freedom (i.e., nine nutrients) as a rejection criterion for outliers and a yield threshold of 8.6 Mg ha–1 after Cate-Nelson partitioning between low- and high-yielders in the P validation data set, D 2 misclassified two specimens compared with nine for CND –r 2 . The D 2 classification was not significantly different from a χ 2 classification (P > 0.05), but the CND – r 2 classification differed significantly from χ 2 or D 2 (P < 0.001). A threshold value for nutrient imbalance could thus be derived probabilistically for conducting D 2 diagnosis, while the CND – r 2 nutrient imbalance threshold must be calibrated using fertilizer trials. In the proposed CND –D 2 procedure, D 2 is first computed to classify the specimen as possible outlier. Thereafter, nutrient indices are ranked in their order of limitation. The D 2 norms appeared less effective in the 1900–2100 CTU zone. Key words: Nutrient balance, simplex closure, variance-covariance matrix, χ 2 distribution, grain corn, nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".