MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969226240 · doi:10.1517/13543776.12.8.1237

Novel therapeutic strategies for impaired endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation

2002· article· en· W1969226240 on OpenAlexaff
Rui Wang, Joseph Fomusi Ndisang

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndotheliumPharmacologyMedicineVascular smooth muscleEndothelial dysfunctionAngiogenesisFibrinolysisAngiotensin IIPlateletImmunologyInternal medicineBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Impaired vascular relaxation is a common aetiology in many cardiovascular diseases and, in most cases, disequilibria in the amounts of endothelium-derived relaxing and constricting factors is the root of problem. Endothelium-derived vasoactive factors modulate vascular tone, smooth muscle cell proliferation, blood coagulation and fibrinolysis, lipoprotein metabolism and the interaction of platelet and leukocyte with the vascular wall. Although the synthesis and release of endothelium-derived vasoactive substances are vulnerable to pathogenic insults, endothelial dysfunction can be corrected pharmacologically using inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin system, endothelin antagonists, inductors of angiogenesis and other compounds. Many recent patents have provided novel formulations of drugs targeting dysfunctional endothelium. Optimised pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of these drugs would greatly improve their clinical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic PatentsSame topicEicosanoids and Hypertension PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207