Sustainable urban foragings in the Canadian metropolis: rummaging through Rita Wong's <i>Forage</i> and Nicholas Dickner's <i>Nikolski</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sustainable urban foragings Foraging and ‘dumpster diving’ are activities associated with a kind of environmentally conscious social activism engaged in by those wanting to live sustainably by maintaining a close connection with the local. The former is generally associated with nature, the latter with the urban environment. Wong's poetry collection, Forage, and Dickner's novel, Nikolski, both feature those who scavenge within their urban environment and suggest a connection between the two activities: to label dumpster diving ‘urban foraging’ is to reveal the dumpster diver's potential to disrupt the urban with ‘wild’ activity. This article uses Michel de Certeau's ‘Walking in the City’ to think through Wong and Dickner's figurations of the two Canadian metropolises, Vancouver and Montreal. These cities become places of subversive urban foraging, where rubbish, or garbage, becomes transformed through renewed visibility, just as the urban space is re-made - potentially - as a place of sustainable possibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.036 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".