MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1969258470 · doi:10.1055/s-0028-1085073

Idiopathic Neonatal Ischemia in the Upper Limb: The Role of the Microsurgeon

2008· article· en· W1969258470 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Elisabeth Zetlitz, Eva Weiler-Mithoff, Töm Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Perinatology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryAmputationIschemiaThrombusDeformityThrombolysisUpper limbUlnar arteryUrokinaseRadial arteryCardiologyArtery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Idiopathic neonatal limb ischemia remains a rare occurrence. It is a devastating process that leads to complete or partial loss of affected limb or severe deformity. The main treatments over the years have been conservative and nonsurgical, such thrombolysis. Surgical treatment has traditionally been delayed until a line of demarcation is clear, at which time amputation of the limb proceeds. We present a case of idiopathic upper limb ischemia in a newborn, where it was clear that nonsurgical management would result in limb necrosis. A thrombus extended from the brachial bifurcation into both ulnar and radial arteries to the wrist. The plastic surgery team performed surgical decompression and microsurgical open thrombectomy to successfully reestablish the circulation to the affected hand. Eight months later, the child remains well. This is the first reported case in the literature where an idiopathic thrombus blocking the brachial, radial, and ulnar arteries is successfully treated microsurgically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of PerinatologySame topicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsFrench-language works237,207