Les modes de management des entreprises au Maroc : entre contingences culturelles et économiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse l’influence de la culture sociétale sur les relations hiérarchiques et les attitudes managériales dans les entreprises marocaines. Après une revue de la littérature qui a conduit à une première sélection de valeurs et attitudes culturelles pertinentes relativement au contexte marocain, une enquête exploratoire et qualitative a été menée auprès d’un échantillon de responsables hiérarchiques dans des entreprises industrielles au Maroc. Les résultats révèlent qu’une entrée par la culture est utile mais insuffisante pour comprendre les spécificités des attitudes au travail et des relations sociales dans l’entreprise. D’autres variables contextuelles explicatives et notamment celles qui conditionnent le degré de précarité des situations de travail dans les PME marocaines sont mises en évidence. L’article montre en outre comment des leviers culturels sont mobilisés par les managers au Maroc, permettant à certains d’asseoir leur pouvoir et à d’autres de surmonter les obstacles eux aussi d’origine culturelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".