Pressure Transient Analysis of the Vertical Fractured Well in Three-Separate Zone With Crossflow in Boxed Reservoirs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract For low permeability or damaged formations, hydraulic fracturing is a broad applied technology. A new mathematical model of the well with infinite-conductivity vertical fractures is described in a three-separate-zone with crossflow in a boxed reservoir, Based on the model, pressure transient behaviors of the vertically fractured well intercepting a three-separate-zone with crossflow is described through the methods of Laplace transform, Fourier integral transform and Stehfest numerical inversion. The influences of parameters of the three-separate-zone with crossflow in a boxed reservoir such as rectangular boundary length (yeD), half fracture length (xfD), the permeability ratio (K1, K2, K3), interporosity flow parameter (λ 1, λ 2), and storability ratio (ω1, ω2, ω3), have the pressure response of a fractured well.Loglog diagnosis graphs of the vertically fracture well pressure are given and analyzed here. The methods can instruct the allocation of production and injection rates, dynamic forecast and development technology of the three-separate-zone with crossflow with infinite-conductivity hydraulic vertically fracture. Introduction Hydraulic fracturing usually creates vertical fractures, unless in shallow layers. Many formations consist of multi-layers due to sedimentary dynamics reasons, and multi-layered formation are fractured to open by hydraulic fracturing operation. Thus, research on pressure transient characteristics of hydraulic fracturing multilayered zone, can help optimizing fracturing treatment design, analyze commingled producing wells performance in a multilayered reservoir after hydraulic fracturing, and give explanations correspond to reality. Choosing fair and reasonable production pressure drop, and obtaining appropriate production and injection allocation systems, has important theoretical directive functions to develop hydraulic fracturing multi-layered reservoirs. In the literature of vertical well pressure analysis in layered reservoirs, Lefkovits (1961) obtained pressure solution of commingled producing wells without crossflow; Tariq (1961) began to consider wellbore storage and skin effects on Lefkovits' solution. Kuchuk (1984) presented well test methods applicable to vertical wells in communication zones by using wellbore pressure and fluid flux; Bourdet (1984) presented vertical wells pressure and derivative type curves in a two-layered reservoir with crossflow in pseudo-steady state and with wellbore storage and skin effects. Using maximum effective wellbore radius concept, Sun (2003) established the maximum wellbore radius model in an infinite three-layered reservoir with crossflow. Zhang (2001) analyzed pressure behavior of multi-layered reservoir, the difference of interflow between depleted zones, and mechanism of interlayer crossflow after well shut-in. Wang and Liu (1999) obtained the method and equation for calculating wellbore pressure in a circular multi-layered infinite extension heterogeneous medium without crossflow. The above mentioned models for calculating pressure behavior in multi-layered reservoirs are mainly aimed at vertical wells, the performance of commingled producing vertically fracture wells are short of careful analyses. Little research on hydraulic fracturing well in multi-layered reservoirs has been done in the literature, Liu and Wang (1993) only obtained some results of infinite conductivity vertically fracture wells performance in a two-layered reservoir. This paper establishes the mathematical model of the infiniteconductivity vertically fracture well
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".